24 Nov
2004
24 Nov
'04
1:21 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
[...] Here are a couple of possibilities, along with some "widgets" that were inspired by the ">>" marks in one of Rene's recent pages.
I realize that you are trying to fit the 's' in with '++', but I feel like the ++ is too big, and that the 's' shrinks too much. I wonder if more of a 3-D approach with overlapping or interlacing would be promising? Or perhaps even impossible overlapping, a la Escher? Dave