Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Hi all,
Could we agree on a naming scheme/implementation scheme for the customization-points?
I prefer
range_begin() range_end() range_size()
to
boost_range_begin() boost_range_end() boost_range_size()
Me too. Using boost_range_xxx seems like some sort of misplaced politeness. Do we really think that someone else will use the names range_begin, etc.? If so, we should claim them first. If not, what's the problem with our using them? Also, it might be a good idea for someone to write Boost guidelines for customization points, explaining the use of ADL, specialization of class templates, broken-compiler workarounds, and the methods that don't work. I'm might volunteer if no one else is eager, but it won't get done for a while. Jonathan