27 May
2004
27 May
'04
7:12 a.m.
Darryl Green wrote:
Andreas Huber <ah2003 <at> gmx.net> writes:
The most important argument is that with boost::fsm you have a choice: - You can easily manually implement FSMs - You can write a code generator that generates boost::fsm client code
Or maybe a code "viewer" would be even better -
Before a generator I would definitely implement a viewer. However, I don't think I will have the time... Regards, Andreas