17 Apr
2007
17 Apr
'07
12:28 p.m.
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola <at> hotmail.com> writes:
Thomas Witt wrote:
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Can you then please mark the failure as expected in the 1_34_0 branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's *not* a regression and there is really no point looking into any additional fixes at this time.
Agreed.
Indeed. I just marked it.
Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the release since it won't change the actual release content.
Fernando, seems like these two new errors
Indeed.
http://tinyurl.com/2hg96q http://tinyurl.com/yujpdk
are a manifestation of the same problem; if so, you might want to mark them as expected failures.
Right. I just marked them. Thanks Fernando