3 Jun
2006
3 Jun
'06
9:32 p.m.
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
1. The name "pqs" should be changed to something a little bit more descriptive.
"unit" feels quite handy.
"Unit" in programming is closely associated with the technique of unit testing, and a library of that name would probably be confused with Boost.Test. (See existing libraries like CppUnit.) I like PQS. Sebastian Redl