4 Aug
2005
4 Aug
'05
2:54 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto@cs.aau.dk> writes:
Also, IIUC, this and other mentions of null terminated strings need to be removed now.
yes, when I get the time or when somebody volunteers (1.33 is out of the question).
If the code has changed, you have to change the docs before 1.33. Otherwise, you have to do the change after 1.33. I assumed that the former was the case.
the former is the case.
Does everybody think it's okay to release 1.33 docs with the false promise that Boost.Range includes special null-terminated string support? That seems very wrong to me, and so avoidable! -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com