28 Dec
2010
28 Dec
'10
10:05 a.m.
Am 27.12.2010 21:05, schrieb Vladimir Prus:
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
4. Change the review process instead from a submission->review->inclusion process that's rigidly scheduled to one that is less rigid and is more fluid.
I think that the current review process is actually good.
How much libs are in the review queue and how long are they waiting for a review (my libs are waiting for more than one year)? The review process is very slow and could be much faster (at least for me). Oliver