6 Nov
2013
6 Nov
'13
9:07 a.m.
Oh yeah. You're right again, and I flubbed up again. Thanks.
How about: cpp_bin_float_single; cpp_bin_float_double; cpp_bin_float_quad;
Fine with me! Those are good names --- consistent with existing Boost style, easy to recognize, and unambiguous. Can we get a consensus on those names?
One other suggestion: cpp_float32_t cpp_float64_t cpp_float128_t which keeps the "cuteness" and link to the names of the hardware types, but the cpp_ prefix indicates it's a software emulation? John.