"David B. Held" <dheld@codelogicconsulting.com> writes:
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes@acm.org> wrote in message news:4.3.2.7.2.20040219145425.031c90a0@mailhost.esva.net...
At 01:54 PM 2/19/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
"Paul A Bristow" <boost@hetp.u-net.com> writes:
A tiny typographic nitpick - Would it lie on the page more neatly as:
// Copyright I M Booster 2002-2004. // Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. // (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt // or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
Maybe. I was not trying to suggest, nor do I think I'd want to mandate, any particular use of line breaks in the comment.
I second that. While Paul's choice of line breaks was a bit prettier, that's the sort of thing we traditionally leave up to the developer.
How about the copyright line? Should that always appear with the license notice?
I don't have an opinion. Any reason why not? What does "with" mean, anyway? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com