Re: [boost] [msm] eUML guard/action location

On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Adam Merz wrote:

Stewart, Robert writes:

...

Here's another suggestion, though it breaks from the logical UML ordering Michael posted previously:

DestState() = CurrentState() + cool_event()[guard()]/(action())

Here's another +1 for this. Not having a strong background with UML, but preferring eUML to the standard frontend, I find this arrangement much more logical.

Are all those parentheses used for optional arguments, or could we consider eliminating them? -- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com