Joel de Guzman wrote:
That's besides the point. The point is that you should be able to use different models of the point concept interchangeably much like STL algorithms can work on different container types. I understand what the original poster was trying to convey, and your opinion is valid, but they both need much more clarification than saying things should be interchangeable.
I think you are missing my point. I could very well rename "distance" to "foo" and my point still holds.
If we are talking high level abstraction principles in s/w design then this thread may never end :> Regards, Arash Partow __________________________________________________ Be one who knows what they don't know, Instead of being one who knows not what they don't know, Thinking they know everything about all things. http://www.partow.net