Re: [boost] [review][STLInterfaces] STLInterfaces review results (ready for merge)

Can we get this merged now that master has re-opened after 1.73? On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:38 AM Barrett Adair via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 2:31 AM Barrett Adair

...

wrote:

...

Many thanks are owed to all who participated in the formal review of Zach

Laine's STLInterfaces library, especially during this busy holiday season:

...

* Hadriel Kaplan - ACCEPT * Andreas Wass - ACCEPT * Rainer Deyke - ACCEPT * Arthur Gruzauskas - ACCEPT * Krystian Stasiowski - ACCEPT * Daniela Engert - CONDITIONALLY ACCEPT * Gavin Lambert - Technical comments

(snip)

The reviews clearly demonstrate a consensus. Accordingly, I'm pleased to

announce that STLInterfaces is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED as a Boost library.

...

Conditions for acceptance: 1. Remove optional dependency on cmcstl2 (issue #27) 2. Add Boost license comments to all files, including appveyor.yml,

.travis.yml, README.md, */CMakeLists.txt (issue #26)

...

3. Support Boost.Build (issue #25) 4. Replace googletest with Boost equivalent (issue #24) 5. Remove usage of non-existent v2_dtl members in container_interface.hpp (issue #22) 6. Include <tuple> for std::tie usage in C++14 mode (issue #21) 7. Fix dangling parens in container_inteface.hpp:731 (issue #20) 8. Make Concepts usage C++20-conformant (issue #13) 9. Remove the destructor in container_interface (issue #12) 10. Add tests for non-copyable value types (issue #30)

(snip)

I've confirmed that STLInterfaces ( https://github.com/tzlaine/stl_interfaces) has met the conditions for acceptance. Review wizards, please reply with any objections.

Merge ticket here: https://github.com/boostorg/admin/issues/174

Thanks, Barrett

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost