Vladimir Prus writes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
The XLS-based regression reports have been re-worked to improve their usability and informativeness. In particular, the detailed report page is now spit into seperate pages, one per library, mainly to reduce the load time. The whole thing can be seen at http://tinyurl.com/3a45y.
Comments on a further directions for improvement, as well as reports of bugs and broken links are welcome and appreciated. The broken logo and test source links will be fixed in the next run.
Some comments:
1. The "fail" entries in user summary used to be white before, and now are green. I think that the previous behaviour was better, now fail entries are hard to find.
Hmm, these used to be yellow, actually. They turned white accidently, and I should have checked for the original color before fixing it. Put on the TODO list, thanks. On a side note, if you provide a note that explains each such failure, it will both make them more visible *and* actually give user a clue how serious the problem is.
2. The user summary for program options shows gray boxes with the "unexp" text. I think this should be "n/a", according to the legend.
Yep, thanks.
3. The linux regression results looks very dump now -- no colors, not table decorations, and so on. I'm not sure if this is related to your changes
It is. In my annoucement I totally forgot to mention that both the XSL reports upload procedure and the report links need to be adjusted to the new directory structure. [Sorry, Martin!]
-- but looks like missing CSS somewhere. This happens both in Konqueror and Mozilla.
It's worse than just a missing CSS -- if you look at the report dates, you'll notice that these are left-overs from the old format. The new pages are there, though -- you just have to access them directly: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux/developer/index.html http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux/user/index.html Thank you for reporting these! -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering