dan marsden wrote:
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
shunsuke wrote:
BTW, I'm tempted to rename Egg to Boost.Functor.
I'd suggest avoiding Functor as a name. Functor has specific meaning in the
functional programming community, which is not consistent with what Egg
delivers.
I'm with Dan.
What about Boost.Functional (already taken?) or Boost.FunctionAdapters, or, my favourite, Boost.FunctionObjectsOnSteroid :). Or just keep Egg, is simple and there is precendent for non descriptive names in boost.
Personally I like the name Egg, it's short enough for a namespace name, and easy to remember. Boost.FunctionObjectsOnSteroid does have a certain something as well :)
Oh, the name game! How about Boost.Funny :-) Sorry, can't resist. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net