9 May
2007
9 May
'07
7:17 p.m.
Doug Gregor wrote:
On May 9, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Jeff Garland wrote:
Having one tree per compiler will seriously break the regression test system, not to mention making it more resource intense for those that build/ test several compilers on a machine. Not saying it can't be layered on, but I don't think having 3 trees to run 3 compilers is a good solution.
What's wrong with having 3 *build* trees? We already do that with the regression test system, except that we call them bin.v2/compiler-1, bin.v2/compiler-2, and bin.v2/compiler-3 rather than compiler-1, compiler-2, and compiler-3.
We'll still only have one source tree.
Oh, that's fine - no problem with that. I mistook the comment to mean you'd need 3 source trees. Jeff