Yes, subobject is definitely the term I was looking for. Hadn't seen this before, thanks for pointing it out! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Evans" <cppljevans@cox-internet.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2:52 PM Subject: Re: [boost] [Serialization] Proposal for improved support for ptrs to contained objects + array data
On 08/17/2006 04:18 PM, Dan Notestein wrote:
The current implementation of serialization has some limitations when handling contained data that I would like to remove. By contained data, I mean data that exists inside the allocated boundary of a containing object that is also being serialized. I've got another problem which required a definition of "contained data" only I called it "iterior data". However, then I remembered:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/01/99387.php
which suggests "subobject" maybe a better term. Would it be desirable to use "subobject" in your description instead of "contained data" in order to avoid a proliferation of aliased terms? [snip]
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost