On 11/27/2014 8:47 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 27/11/14 02:32, Edward Diener wrote:
Review Result:
Based on the voting for acceptance or not, based on the discussions during the review period, and based on Steven Ross's responses, I have decided that Steven Ross's library should be accepted into Boost.
I did not really participate in the review, but I did notice there was consensus that the documentation was not really satisfactory.
Was this issue already addressed during the review or will it be addressed during the integration period?
There were a number of specific documentation suggestions during the review period and I think Steven Ross responded to them and is cognizant of them. I did mention some of them in the review results. But if you have any other documentation suggestions of your own I am sure he is listening.