27 Jul
2006
27 Jul
'06
3:47 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:36:59AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:11:21AM +0400, Simon Atanasyan wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
Is stlport4 "better" than Cstd?
Cstd is an old implementation. It does not conforms to standard. And it will never conforms because we (Sun) need to maintains binary compatibility with old releases. Stlport is closer to standard and contains some features necessary for Boost.
Doesn't using stlport4 require an installation of the Sun C++ compiler installed for access to libstlport.so?
Never mind. I see that Sun allows free redistribution of libstlport.so. -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)