Re: [boost] [test] BOOST_CHECK_NOT_EQUAL wanted

On 8/30/07, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff@gmail.com> wrote:

There are way to many predicates out there to introduce direct library support for each one. The recomendation is to use generic predicate support instead.

There are only 5 more comparison operators defined by the language: less, less equal, greater, greater equal and not equal. Maybe it is possible to make it easier to add these, I see there is some complexity involved by looking at the code. It makes a whole lot of sense to add the complementary BOOST_CHECK_NOT_EQUAL - even if it's just for symmetric reasons. Kevin