25 Jan
2007
25 Jan
'07
2:52 p.m.
Roland Schwarz wrote:
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
What happened? I thought we were down to 6 failures at some point... Are all these new failures just indication of a problem in some low-level library?
I am not absolutely sure, but as far as I understood the errors were always present, but masked due to a bug in the process_jam_log scripts.
What exactly does 'always' mean here ? Are we sure those newly exposed errors really are regressions ? Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...