Re: [boost] is something seriously wrong with zero_vector?

#include <boost/numeric/ublas/vector.hpp> #include <iostream> #include <iterator> int main() { boost::numeric::ublas::zero_vector<double> v (10); std::copy (v.begin(), v.end(), std::ostream_iterator<double> (std::cout, " ")); } This prints _nothing_. Is this the expected behavior? I expected 10 '0's.