27 Sep
2010
27 Sep
'10
4:54 a.m.
At Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:40:31 +0800, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
The way concepts are done now is to define the syntactic requirements (not so much the semantics)
I think I know what you mean, but I wouldn't say it that way. Notwithstanding the fact that the compiler can never verify semantic conformance to a concept, the semantics are a required part of any concept definition. If your concept omits semantics, it's broken. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com