6 Jun
2004
6 Jun
'04
2:13 a.m.
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes:
My current view is that Boost.Range should contain both itarator_range<> and range<>, but that range-based algorithms should use range<>
If I understand you correctly, it sounds a bit rigid. Would you not provide a range-based lower_bound as a matter of principle, or what? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com