5 May
2005
5 May
'05
10:51 a.m.
"David Sankel" wrote: Thanks for your review, first.
However, I cannot see any wide-spread use for the multiton library. While an interesting idea, the mutiton would be better implemented as a map<string,object> for runtime or just shared variables at compile-time. These options are more flexible from the get-go.
Purpose of multiton is to hide such infrastructure from the user. Above mentioned techniques are still available for specific needs. /Pavel