"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@pdimov.com> writes:
Anthony Williams:
Shall I hold off committing a fix to boost::thread for now, then?
I've taken the liberty of fixing it to use type<void>(), extending it to 9 arguments and adding a member function test. Please take a look at revision 45621; I hope I didn't do anything wrong. We'll probably want to add a normal function test along the same lines, and possibly use variadic templates when available.
Thank you. Much appreciated.
As a note, it seems that the two thread classes (win32, pthread) need to be refactored in some way since now they can desync. For example, the win32 thread uses rvalue references, and the pthread one does not.
Yes. I think that the implementations are more similar than they are different. The rvalue reference stuff is a work in progress. Anthony -- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL