[Please don't top post. Try outlook-quotefix or oe-quotefix: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/, http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ ] At Fri, 28 May 2010 15:32:22 +0200, Ingo Loehken wrote:
From: David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>
Furthermore, your logic seems flawed to me. By analogy:
There is no need for Intel processors (we can all use AMD). Therefore there is no use for an Intel processor?
No, thats a twisted interpretation. I'm just pointing out, there is a need for shared ownership.
I'm not sure I agree that there actually is a need. All the shared ownership scenarios I can think of can be translated into single-ownership-at-a-higher-level. That, however, is not always convenient. -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com