Vicente BOTET <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
Well I can see that you use boost::conversion namespace and boost::convert class. So you are using two 'namaspaces'. I don't know if this follows the Boost.rule. In any case it is not quite orthodox.
I see that your PImpl proposal defines a class piml which is not even in the boost namespace.
I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Are you trying to justify particular behavior using some wacky/bad failed proposal as an example? So, for 'convert' I created 2 'namespaces' instead of 1. So, what now? As for Pimpl, then it's over 4 years old now. If the time comes, I'll re-adjust with the spirit of the day. Apologies but I find your line of reasoning like "you do this" somewhat immature. What have you got all jumpy about anyway? I was not fighting anyone. I was not criticizing anything. I was only reminding what (I think) Dave Abrahams voiced in one of his emails. V.