Gennadiy Rozental said: (by the date of Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:02:05 -0500)
So Boost.Test *doesn't* require separate compilation?
If that's the case, I'll remove it from the list and add a mention of it to the paragraph at the bottom of the box
Well. As usual the picture is gray :o)
Under this URL http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/test/doc/usage/generic.html there is written: ---- Prefer offline compiled libraries to the inline included components If you are just want to write quick simple test in environment where you never used Boost.Test before - yes, use included components. But if you plan to use Boost.Test on permanent basis, small investment of time needed to build (if not build yet), install and change you makefiles/project settings will soon return to you in a form of shorter compilation time. Why do you need to make your compiler do the same work over and over again? ---- -- Janek Kozicki |