-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sutton Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:41 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Mathias Gaunard Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Proposal reviewing
Why is that scheme necessary? The score and the list of possible mentors are separate things.
We could just select the top 10 projects with the highest average that have at least one mentor assigned to them, resolving the cases where the same mentor is assigned multiple times manually.
That's eventually how the process is going to end up working out. I'm just trying to make sure that each mentor gets their own choice of proposal rather than just trying to pick the top 10. That's not necessarily the same as the top 10 with mentors assigned, but it probably will be.
I'm confused (as usual :-) Should I be commenting and assigning a score to ALL proposals, adding a comment "none?". In many cases I don't have an informed view, or others have said it all already. And doing this will increase the torrent of emails, under which I am already floundering! I'm not convinced that a scoring system will prove necessary at all? Paul