On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
Can't you use result_of?
As far as I can see, the current boost::result_of implementation doesn't use decltype or typeof.
The boost::result_of on svn trunk uses decltype when BOOST_HAS_DECLTYPE is defined. This happens automatically for gcc versions after 4.2.
Correction - for gcc > 4.2, the boost::result_of on svn trunk uses decltype only when you compile with -std=c++0x. It uses the old TR1 heuristic otherwise.
"__decltype()" works even outside of C++0x mode. Shouldn't it be used instead? -- gpd