On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:27:54 -0600 Christian Holmquist <c.holmquist@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] The problem with lack of review managers has been going on for a while, how about this (already suggested maybe?): Split the review manager into two positions:
* Responsible person 1 - Has knowledge on Boost's infrastructure, such as, tools, documentation, test and other best practices that should be followed by all libraries. Has enough background in boost to make a sound judgement when the review ends based on the discussions, without getting into the gritty details of the code or domain at hand.
* Responsible person 2 - Has knowledge about the domain and will take more active part in guiding the library towards boost's standards in terms of generic programming etc.. [...]
+1. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *