Re: [boost] [accumulators] misprint in accumulators users guide

Neal Becker wrote:

The example under 'Defining a New Feature' says: typedef impl::mean_accumulator< mpl::_1 > impl;

I think it needs to say: typedef accumulators::impl::mean_accumulator< mpl::_1 > impl;

Does gcc complain about the changing meaning of "impl" here? I've seen it complain about similar code before. I'll make the change, thanks. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com