30 May
2014
30 May
'14
3:49 p.m.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski
2014-05-06 17:06 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely
: I didn't mean VC++'s behaviour is valid.
Would that qualify for a C++03 defect macro in Boost.Config?
Yes, if several Boost libraries are likely to need to detect this problem. OTOH, Boost.Config doesn't supply defect macros for all compiler bugs, so if is unlikely multiple libraries need such a macro then it doesn't have a place in Boost.Config. HTH, --Beman