Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Daniel James <dnljms@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 September 2010 11:20, Daniel James <dnljms@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally, I wouldn't use a table for the data, it crams too much into a small space. I'd just use a separate page for each compiler. Here's an example of what I mean.
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/Guidelines/Warnings/Microsoft
I think that this would be more helpful if it just listed how each warning responds to various edits instead of suggesting how it should be fixed. For example, the unreferenced formal parameter warning section could look like this:
C4100 (Unreferenced formal parameter) - delete the parameter name or add a reference to the parameter in the function: (void)foo;
I thought I remember the latter triggering another warning. I don't remember the exact verbage or compiler. Or does the prefix (void) supress that? Jeff