19 Jan
2010
19 Jan
'10
12:56 p.m.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, John Maddock wrote:
OK. Should I go ahead with the move from graph_parallel to graph/parallel? Does anyone have any objections? To be clear, the move is just graph_parallel to graph/parallel, with a separate build system and the same subdirectories that are there now, and still producing two separate libraries (boost_graph and boost_graph_parallel like now).
+1 from me. Can you also make sure that the parallel graph lib is linked to from the main graph docs (assuming that's how it's supposed to be "discovered"?)
It is linked now -- I fixed that after the first few times that issue was mentioned. -- Jeremiah Willcock