Is there any difference between the book and the sample described at: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/libs/mpl/doc/paper/mpl_paper.pdf David Abrahams-3 wrote:
I'm confused. If states 1 and 2 have associated data of types A and B, the fact that A and B are both derived from C does not mean that there is only one copy of the base class... or are you doing something special to have states 1 and 2 share a single object of type D derived from A and B?
[Please keep in mind that I'm not trying to say that the Book's FSM is better than the one in your library. It's clearly more limited.]
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FSM-Review-Announcement-tp18820219p18984305.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.