Re: [boost] [config] Proposed BOOST_NOEXCEPT_NOTHROW macro

On 2012-08-29 15:31, Beman Dawes wrote:

My thinking was that there was some small advantage to beginning each of the noexcept macros with BOOST_NOEXCEPT.

I worry that BOOST_THROWS_NOTHING would be misconstrued as a replacement for "Throws: Nothing" specifications, and that isn't the case. BOOST_NEVER_THROWS might be a bit better. But I think I still prefer BOOST_NOEXCEPT_OR_NOTHROW. Or the original suggested BOOST_NOEXCEPT_NOTHROW.

--Beman

BOOST_NOEXCEPT_AND_NOTHROW ? OR sounds like a choice. Just my 2ct.