4 May
2005
4 May
'05
1:04 a.m.
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote in message news:005701c55008$0eacc010$6401a8c0@pdimov2...
Rob Stewart wrote:
I don't like the status()/symlink_status() split. How about overloading like this:
struct follow_symlink_t { }; extern const follow_symlink_t follow_symlink;
status_flags status(path const &); status_flags status(path const &, follow_symlink_t);
FWIW, I'm in favor of the current design.
Rationale? --Beman