Thomas Witt wrote:
Hi All,
the xpressive review is now officially closed. That being said I know it's not a small library so if anybody(John?) feels like he can provide a review in the next few days I'll be happy to accept it.
FWIW, I'd vote my support for xpressive. I'd vote that it be added to the boost libraries. The question some people ask is why have an alternative library that overlaps over existing libraries in boost (i.e. Boost.Regex and Spirit). I'd say that we should always welcome alternative libraries. I do not see anything from our Boost Library Requirements and Guidelines that prohibits alternative designs and implementations. I'd give xpressive consistent As in terms of design, implementation, documentation and potential usefulness. For me, that's more than enough reason for acceptance. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net