--- Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin@comsoft.de> wrote:
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
I am using Boost.Python all the time under Tru64 with cxx 6.5, and have been doing so for many years. I guess there must be a difference in how we compile. I am not using bjam but a SCons-based build system. The result of building with the Boost CVS from earlier this morning, including the cxx commands, is here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/results/2005_06_15_0643/tru64_py241_build_log
All our regression tests (many) passed.
Do you use the patched header file for <iotraits> when compiling boost.python? Because I just tried compiling with different options and now I got bitten by the missing support for std::fpos_t.
I don't think so. I am using the Boost tree as I get it with cvs update. If you want to find out exactly what I am doing go to http://cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/all.html and copy the source bundle including Python into a new empty directory on your Tru64 machine. Then simply run perl cctbx_python_241_bundle.selfx and watch the cxx commands fly by. Cheers, Ralf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com