14 Jan
2009
14 Jan
'09
2:01 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Robert Jones <robertgbjones@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
I've decided not to attempt support for Cygwin in the next version of Boost.Filesystem.
I don't entirely understand the implications of this. Without Boost.Filesystem, are we effectively saying that Boost as a whole non longer supports the predominant free C++ compiler, or is that a bit of an overstatement?
That's way too strong, although:
Does lack of Boost.Filesystem support impact the useability of other areas of Boost?
Probably. But if anyone cares about this, they should fix Cygwin. --Beman