On 06/20/2005 04:25 AM, Maksym Motornyy wrote: [snip]
search for "don't work with enumeration types:"
Since enumerators in my library are plain classes there is no problem to use them with MPL. Even more, mpl::vector is used to define their sequence order (policy::enumerators typedef).
Hmm... This sounds like it might work for me. I'll take a closer look.
in range_all.zip. If your enumerators can be used to make tuples or variants with "named" fields, as done in the:
cppljevans/tuple_nested_enum_test.cpp
in the vault, I'd be interested.
I can't swear I understand what is your goal. The test code is a bit hard to read. Could you explain, please?
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sorry about that. Is it hard to read because of: a) the formatting or: b) lack of commenting or: c) use of template metaprogramming or all three? Of course I understand it needs more comments, but it was uploaded in order to reference from: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.std.c++/msg/7d7d19cf16333d0b?hl=en where the first paragraph of my reponse hopefully makes the *goal* a little clearer.