4 Dec
2019
4 Dec
'19
4:01 p.m.
Vinnie Falco wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:42 PM Peter Dimov via Boost
wrote: I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit that changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.
I don't feel strongly about it either way, but since when is data() guaranteed to be unique per instance?
This is a property of the implementation that is no longer true after the change. It may not have been "guaranteed" but it was true.