1 Jun
2005
1 Jun
'05
1:57 p.m.
On Tue, 31 May 2005 16:12:47 -0400, christopher diggins <cdiggins@videotron.ca> wrote: [...]
But fine, let's say that won't happen until heck freezes over, do you have an opinion on the fact that boost array has no constructors simply to support the rather obscure syntax of:
boost::array a = { { 1, 2, 3; } } // notice two sets of { }
"Simply"? This syntax allows you to initialize a const array. I typically use boost::array for constant lookup tables (often global), so I need to initialize the array this way. If you take this away boost::array would be useless the way I see it. -- Be seeing you.