On May 9, 2005, at 7:19 PM, Joe Gottman wrote:
"Stefan Strasser" <sstrasser@systemhaus-gruppe.de> wrote in message news:427F7635.4010303@systemhaus-gruppe.de...
you might be interested in this document from the new c++0x mailing:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2005/n1796.html
for the naming discussion, proposed syntax is for(int i : vec) (personally I don't care if it's called BOOST_FOREACH or BOOST_FOR)
This proposal might be a good reason to rush BOOST_FOREACH into boost version 1.33. If the standards committee is considering adding something like BOOST_FOREACH, it would be good for them to have some data about how easy and useful the average programmer finds this functionality.
It's too late to add anything into 1.33. Doug