"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> writes:
It looks fine at 1600 x 1200 ;-)
But I immediately switched to the user plain Times Roman font setting to be able to read it without eye strain.
Which shows the impossibility of pleasing many of the people much of time.
Sure, the font choices aren't perfect for me either. But the overall design is pleasing.
I don't find the new Boost site appearance an real improvement over the previous plain vanilla version.
I think we should stop obsessing about appearance and concentrate on content - which is already pretty good.
The appearance /is/ content: it communicates something about the organization and the quality of its work. I happen to think the other content on the Boost site could be improved a lot too :) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com