19 Mar
2012
19 Mar
'12
11:18 a.m.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Joel <jdy@cryregarder.com> wrote:
2012/3/17 Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga <at> gmail.com>:
If we want to achieve direct comparison, Boost.Unordered needs to go Boost.Intrusive or Boost.Multiindex route, and offer additional search overloads that can find "equivalent keys":
Olaf van der Spek <ml <at> vdspek.org> writes:
That route looks like a good one. Avoiding the need for expensive temps is great.
Perhaps map and flat_map need this as well? Should bugs be filed?
All find() might be affected, but it may be a conscious design decision. You could file bugs and find out. -- Olaf