I'd really appreciate it if you could answer this question from my previous post:
2. Is this the promised simplification of the design we posted in http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/11/97002.php? If so, by what measure is your approach a simplification?
Honestly, I don't remember what it was specfically in response to. It was intended to illustrate my view that the library can and should be extended without adding things to base classes, and finally that it simpler and more effective to do it this way. The code attached implements all of the save_array functionality included in mattias system (actually more) in far fewer lines of code and with the benefits described in the posts.
And also, I'd appreciate it if you'd respond to the paragraph below.
I actually don't want to get into a discussion of which non-intrusive design is best. The social and code interoperability dynamics of any non-intrusive design are the same, and that's really what I want to discuss. Please let me know when you're ready to talk about that.
Sorry, I don't even know what that means. Robert Ramey