22 Sep
2005
22 Sep
'05
4:51 p.m.
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
John Maddock wrote:
Does anyone know why it's necessary to test __WIN32__ and WIN32? A quick test showed that vc6-7.1, cw8-9.4, como 4.3.3, gcc 3.4.2 (minGW), dmc, bcc 5.6.4, and intel 7.1-8.0 all define _WIN32. What's left over?
Borland.
Right, I forgot to mention it.
Hmmm .... No I didn't: it's in my original list ;-)
But I also tested it (5.6.4) and it defines _WIN32 too.
Jonathan