Re: [boost] [range] range library proposal implementation rev.2

Atry wrote:

What about hold a streambuf in a lexical_range? By the way that streambuf should be stack-based.

I'm still not sure how. BTW, I bet a stream construction is slower than lexical_cast<string> under Boost1.35.

Ah, it seems that you forget to copy u16_to_u32_iterator...

It will be added sooner or later. :-) Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame